In a message dated 04/10/2008 _jPolanik at nc.rr.com_ (mailto:jPolanik@nc.rr.com) writes: [Jud]: I [am] interested in receiving the vital message from you which deals with my recent demolition of the *I think therefore I am.* absurdity. [Joe]: consider a statement such as ‘I experience; therefore, I am’ or the simpler ‘I am’. [Jud]: Such predicatationally truncated, sententially orphanic verbalisms are meaningless [Joe (new)]: the theory of the implicit copula complement unifies the










Leave a Reply